John C#samurai

Software Engineer Expert

I developed this video streaming player in 2016 and it still works today.

Previous Employment

ClearForce, Vienna, VA | 2019 – 2024
CallRevu, Hunt Valley, MD | 2019
Equifax, McLean, VA | 2018
Freddie Mac, McLean, VA | 2016 – 2017
Expovision, Falls Church, VA | 2015 – 2016
Cambridge Associates, Arlington, VA | 2012 – 2015
Gannett, Falls Church, VA | 2011 – 2012
Cvent, McLean, VA | 2010 – 2011
Feld Entertainment, Vienna, VA | 2008 – 2010

Education

B.S. Computer Science
University of Virginia
2008

Familiar Technologies

.NET, .NET 8, .NET API, .NET Aspire, .NET Core, .NET Dependency Injector, .NET Framework, .NET Standard, .NET Web API, .NET Web API2, ADO.NET, Agile Kanban, Agile Scrum, AJAX, ARM GNU Toolchain, ASP, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC, Autofac Dependency Injector, Azure AD, Azure Cloud, Azure Container Apps, Azure Container Instances, Azure Container Registry, Azure DevOps, Azure Entra ID, Azure Functions, Azure SQL, BDD, C, C#, C++, Castle Windsor Dependency Injector, Cipher Suites, CLion, CLR, Cold Fusion, Confluence, COTS, CSS, Cygwin, DNS, Docker, Entity Framework, ETL, Fast Lexical Analyzer (FLEX), Fiddler, Gherkin, Git, GNU Emacs, Gradle, HTML, HTTP, IBM Web Sphere, IDA Pro, IIS, IoT, Java, JavaScript, Jenkins, Jira, jQuery, LINQ, LINQ2SQL, Linux, Message Passing Interface (MPI), Microsoft Graph, Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS), MIPS Assembly, MSTest, NoSQL, NUnit, OAuth, OData, Office 365, OpenAPI, Postman, Power BI, PowerShell, Quartz.NET, RedHat Enterprise Linux, SaaS, Selenium, SEO, SharePoint, SimpleInjector Dependency Injector, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SQL Management Objects, SQL Server, SSMS, Swagger, T-SQL, T3 Protocol, TFS, TFVC, TLS, ToirtoiseSVN, UML, Unix, VHDL, Visual Studio, Waterfall, WebLogic, Windows OS LocalService, Windows Research Kernel, Windows Server, WPF, x86 Assembly, XAML, XML, XSD, XUnit, YAML

• My Team

Socrates

.NET Software Epistemologist

The unexamined code is not worth executing.

Consider from the beginning: if one is, can it be, but not partake of being?

So there would also be the being of the one, and that is not the same as the one. For if it were, it couldn’t be the being of the one, nor could the one partake of it. On the contrary, saying that one is would be like saying one is one. But this time that is not the hypothesis, namely, what the consequences must be, if one is one, but if one is. Isn’t that so? Is that because ‘is’ signifies something other than ‘one’? So whenever someone, being brief, says ‘one is,’ would this simply mean that the one partakes of being?

Let’s say again what the consequences will be, if one is. Consider whether this hypothesis must not signify that the one is such as to have parts. In this way: If we state the ‘is’ of the one that is, and the ‘one’ of that which is one, and if being and oneness are not the same, but both belong to that same thing that we hypothesized, namely, the one that is, must it not itself, since it is one being, be a whole, and the parts of this whole be oneness and being?

• My Team

Miyamoto Musashi

C# Software Strategist

The realm where nothing exists, or cannot be known, is seen as empty.

Of course, emptiness does not exist. Knowing of nonexistence while knowing of existence is emptiness.

Wrongly viewed among people of the world, not understanding anything is itself considered emptiness. This is not real emptiness; it is all delusion. In the context of this science of computer science as well, in carrying out the way as an engineer, not knowing the laws of engineers is not emptiness; being confused, one may call a state of helplessness emptiness, but this is not real emptiness.

Engineers learn computer science accurately and go on to practice the techniques of computer science diligently. The way that is practiced by engineers is not obscure in the least. Without any confusion of mind, without slacking off at any time, polishing the mind and attention, sharpening the eye that observes and the eye that sees, one should know real emptiness as the state where there is no obscurity and the clouds of confusion have cleared away.

As long as they do not know the real Way, whether in C# or in worldly matters, everybody may think their path is sure and is a good thing, but from the point of view of the straight way of mind, seen in juxtaposition with overall social standards, they turn away from the true Way by the personal biases in their minds and the individual warps in their vision.

Knowing that mentality, taking straightforwardness as basic, taking the real mind as the Way, practicing computer science in the broadest sense, thinking correctly, clearly, and comprehensively, taking emptiness as the Way, you see the Way as emptiness. In emptiness there is good but no evil. Wisdom exists, logic exists, the Way exists, mind is empty.

• My Team